美国留学dissertation范文示例

发布于: 2021/01/25  4:29 am

摘要:这是美国留学的一篇dissertation,重点讨论了伦理道德的重要标准和两面性。希望大家通过这篇文章的学习能够对美国留学dissertation有更深刻的了解。
伦理道德通常是道德研究的标准之一,对于伦理的研究一般都是出于道德的需求。但是伦理所处于一个常见的困境当中,以一个$$广告为例,一方面烟草企业的发展就需要进行有效的营销宣传,但是烟草的宣传却意味着宣传一种不健康的生活理念,这显然是与道德要求相悖。本文就围绕道德的重要标准进行研究分析,并通过这篇文章的示范让大家对美国留学论文有所认识和了解。

Abstract

Quite a lot has been said and done about Business Ethics. Several studies have been conducted emphasizing on the importance of what and How in business environment. However there has been put quite little effort in describing in a unified term of what business ethics exactly asks. Nevertheless existing giant businesses have not been scrutinized of their ethical practices.

This study is an attempt to investigate what ethics does Tobacco Industry practice. The case of Pakistan is taken to complete this research so as to check in absence of strict government regulations how responsible does the industry behaves. Cost Benefit analysis procedure for clarifying this ethical dilemma shows that in the absence of strong health hazard data the industry's overall functioning can be considered ethical under utilitarian school of thought. This is because the number of beneficiaries of the industry in a developing country like Pakistan is immense and the recognized harms are comparatively less. This thesis gives the real coaster effect when these results are revealed.

However this is a deductive study that leads to further research questions and discovers new undiscovered ventures to explore.

Introduction

Ethics is mostly known as the study of decision making that while doing this considers the widely accepted moral standards. One of the ethical questions however is the ethical dilemma, in which an issue has two conflicting bur arguably valid sides. A classical ethical dilemma example can be of the debate on allowing the tobacco companies to advertise. If allowed to do so then that means encouragement of an unhealthy practice but on the other hand if they are not allowed to advertise then it is clear discrimination between rights.

Similarly Employees have the right to privacy, but employers also have right to expect safe, competent behavior from employees. Now who is to decide the winner between employees choice of taking drugs or employers' liberty to let undergo their employees through drug tests? Many such ethical questions are faced by managers every day.

返回页首
举报
点评这篇文章
点评这篇文章
 
1 2 3 4 5
0个人参与评分
Advertiser Disclosure
最新商家点评
ChicagoChinaRen总共有1121条点评, 1120次评分
飞鱼装修
Review by 小文 at 08/29/25
很好的一次装修体验。找了很多家华人公司,这是价格最公道的一家,做好后没有像其他公司那样借故加收额外的费用,工人态度...
旗舰贷款
Review by ykun at 07/20/25
Highly recommend my loan originator Yan Guo. It's...
Kevin 赖 -- 我爱我家,芝加哥资深地产经纪 ,值得信赖!
Review by jingjing071888 at 07/05/25
kevin是一个真的很值得托付的经纪人 他对房产市场的了解非常深入,给出的建议非常有价值。...